On the other hand, in the group of non-psychotic patients the response was very similar in both treatments (CET - 6 in 10 patients with good response, TMS - 7 in 11 patients with good response).
The authors concluded that TEC is clearly superior to treat DM with psychosis and that TMS has a similar response to ECT for the treatment of DM patients with psychosis.
They also concluded that TMS for four weeks has greater efficacy. This result is opposite to that published by Paschal-Leone et al in 1996 showed good response with the use of TMS for the treatment of DM with depression. http://www.bodyactive-nation.co.uk/forum/Exercises/5446-The-Best-Biceps-Exercise-You-re-Not-Doing#p69715
The reason may be due to the fact that Paschal-Leone et al used different paradigms and outpatients in TMS.
Because the patients in the study by Pascal-Leone et al remain in outpatient treatment for five months, they should be considered substantially less sick than patients with diabetes with acute psychosis who participated in the study Gnaws et al.
Added to the fact that the study of Grays et al had an unblended trial and there was no placebo group.
Another important aspect that should be addressed in the treatment of depression and TMS inhibitory role via inter hemispheric corpus callous [Moore, 2000].
Meknes et al [1999] demonstrated that inhibitory TMS applied to the right prefrontal cortex produced a significant antidepressant effect, in contrast to the excitement of the left frontal lobe with high-frequency TMS. They conducted a pilot TMS stimulation of the right prefrontal lobe case-control study. http://www.naturalmuscle.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2261.0

No comments:
Post a Comment